@article{11482,
  author = {Keith E. Whittington},
  title = {The Confirmation Process We Deserve},
  abstract = { <p>In his study of the federal appointments process, Michael Gerhardt appeals to new institutionalist theories in political science as a necessary supplement to traditional constitutional analysis. The confirmation process is shaped not only by the procedures laid out in the Constitution for nominating and confirming judicial and executive officials, but also by historically developed norms and practices and current political interests. The confirmation process reflects the multiple and contradictory interests of a variety of actors, including the president, the Senate, interest groups and the media. The president has an intrinsic edge in the modern appointments process, but the fragmentation and ideological polarization of the Senate makes presidential success more difficult.</p> },
  year = {2001},
  journal = {Policy Review},
  volume = {107},
  pages = {76-},
  url = {http://www.hoover.org/research/confirmation-process-we-deserve},
  language = {eng},
}